Seraphim Lab LiveDelegate
Flare mainnet · FTSOv2

The state of the oracle, live

Where the protocol clock stands, who carries the most delegated vote power, and how accurate they are — read from the Flare Systems Explorer and refreshed every voting round. Our own provider is measured by the same columns as everyone else.

Voting round now

#1470213round 1,893 of 3,360 in this epoch

One round every 90s. Each round asks every provider for a price on every anchor feed and pays only the submissions that land inside the consensus band.

Next reward epoch

#438in 1d 12h 39m

Expected to open 2026-10-01 19:00 UTC. A delegation you change now takes effect from that epoch.

A reward epoch is the protocol's accounting period — 3.5 days of 90-second voting rounds. Accuracy rewards accrue inside it and are claimed against it, so every figure on this page is scoped to epoch #437 unless it says otherwise.

The 8 largest providers by vote power

98 participating · sorted by vote power

How to read this table

Over-deleg
share of vote power above the 2.5% network cap, which earns nothing extra — the largest providers are usually the most over-delegated
Primary band
anchor-feed hit rate this epoch — the accuracy that earns rewards. The rule under each figure is that figure on a fixed 0–100% scale; the ink tick on it is the field median, 39.35% across all 98 participating providers
Availability
share of rounds submitted and revealed; under 95% is flagged, and a provider registered with no band hits at all is marked in words
Est. APR
delegator-net annualised rate from the last epoch, after the provider's fee

Swipe the table sideways for all 7 columns →

ProviderVote powerOver-delegPrimary bandAvailabilityFeeEst. APR
Flare.Space2.90B64.4%58.49%100.00%20%2.25%
Bifrost Wallet1.50B31.2%28.65%100.00%20%2.23%
Atlas TSO983.30M0.0%43.83%100.00%20%2.42%
FlareFi886.74M0.0%71.05%100.00%20%2.25%
AlphaOracle839.30M0.0%66.60%100.00%20%2.25%
A-FTSO789.77M0.0%53.96%100.00%20%2.53%
NORTSO765.23M0.0%65.26%100.00%20%2.33%
Flare Oracle753.97M0.0%77.27%100.00%20%2.25%

Rows are the top 8 of 98 by vote power until you sort a column. Vote power buys weight in the consensus, not accuracy — the two columns are independent, and the register sorts every provider on either. Full table with accuracy, eligibility and stability →

FIELD MEDIAN 39.35%0%25%50%75%100%Seraphim FTSO — 17.58%
FIELD MEDIAN 39.35%0%25%50%75%100%Seraphim FTSO — 17.58%
FigureLive data, not a schematic: primary band hit rate across the 98 providers with a recorded rate in reward epoch #437, counted into 5-point columns — the tallest column holds 27 providers. The ink rule is the field median, 39.35%; the gold rule is our own submission, wherever the epoch has put it. Per-provider detail is on the register.
Where we sit in that field

#92of 98 by vote power

#1 · most vote power91 ahead of us · 6 behind us#98

Scale, not accuracy — which is why the table above is sorted by vote power and we are not in it. Accuracy is the figure above, where our own rule stands in the same distribution as everyone else's; the full row is on the register.

Market and funding context

Epoch #438 offers

FLR / USD
—
FTSO feeds funded
62
FDC offers
8.93M FLR

Feed and attestation funding is offered per reward epoch and sets what accuracy is worth: 62 anchor feeds carry rewards into epoch #438. FLR/USD is quoted from Routescan for scale only — rewards are paid in FLR.

Convinced by the data? Delegating takes two minutes. Delegate to Seraphim →